ACD/Boiling Point
vs. Catalog
|
|
Planning a distillation in the near future? Hoping to characterize your new compound with measurement of a simple physicochemical property? We suggest you think twice before relying completely on the nearest Catalog Handbook of Fine Chemicals published by a major supplier.
Fused-ring faux pas
From what we can see, there are some discrepancies that need to be addressed. Take 9-vinylanthracene, for example. The boiling point is listed as 61-66°C (at 10 torr). That is questionably low, compared to the analogue 9-methylanthracene, also listed in the Catalog at 196-7°C (at 12 torr). Is it reasonable that a switch from a vinyl to a methyl side group gives such a pronounced difference in boiling point? The value predicted by ACD/Boiling Point for 9-vinylanthracene is 214.6°C (at 10 torr).
 |
|
 |
| 9-vinylanthracene |
|
9-methylanthracene |
| Aldrich: 61-66°C/10 torr |
|
Aldrich: 196-7°C/12 torr |
| ACD/BP: 214.6°C /10 torr |
|
ACD/BP: 195.6/12 torr |
Fluorinated Folly
Or
how about 2,4-dichlorobenzotrifluoride? Its boiling point is
listed in the Catalog as 117-8°C with no pressure stated,
leading one to presume it is a 760 torr measurement. Again, we
find this boiling point questionably low; a very near relative to
this compound, 2-chlorobenzotrifluoride, for example, has a
boiling point at 152°C and another close relative,
1,3-dichlorobenzene has a boiling point of 172-3°C. The value
predicted by ACD/Boiling Point
for 2,4-dichlorobenzotrifluoride is 193°C.
 |
|
 |
| 2,4-dichlorobenzotrifluoride |
|
2-chlorobenzotrifluoride |
| Aldrich: 117-8°C |
|
Aldrich: 152°C |
| ACD/BP: 193.2°C |
|
ACD/BP: 155.7°C |
Contradictory
azetidinones
Catalog values for the azetidinone family appear to be slightly problematic, too. The boiling point for 2-azetidinone is listed as 106°C/15 torr which corresponds to 222°C/760 torr. However, its ester derivative, 4-acetoxy-2-azetidinone, is listed as 80-82°C, with no pressure given so presumably it is at 760 torr. The ester boiling point seems questionably low to us. The value predicted by ACD/Boiling Point for 4-acetoxy-2-azetidinone is 297°C.
 |
|
 |
| 4-acetoxy-2-azetidinone |
|
2-azetidinone |
| Aldrich: 80-82°C |
|
Aldrich: 106°C/15 torr ; 222°C |
| ACD/BP: 296.5 °C |
|
ACD/BP: 105.6/15 torr; 222.4°C |
Dienal
Discrepancy
The
trans, trans-2,4-dienal set of compounds have Catalog
boiling points of 115°C /10 torr and 97.5°C /10 torr for
the decadienal and nonadienal forms, respectively. These appear to
be in agreement, but not with their heptadienal homologue, which
is listed at 84-5°C with no pressure given (therefore,
presumed to be 760 torr). The value predicted by ACD/Boiling Point
for trans, trans-2,4- heptadienal is 49°C/10 torr,
corresponding to 160(9)°C.
 |
|
 |
| trans, trans-2,4-heptadienal |
|
trans, trans-2,4-nonadienal |
| Aldrich: 84-5°C |
|
Aldrich: 97.5°C /10 torr; 222.4°C |
| ACD/BP: 177.4°C |
|
ACD/BP: 114.4°C/10 torr; 244.6°C |
The Trouble with Phosphorus
Some phosphorus-containing compounds show very wide discrepancies. In certain cases, we found the B.P. values in another database, the Chapman and Hall Chemical Database, at reduced pressures. These values compared very well with those from our database, but served to cast further doubt on the values found in the Aldrich catalog. For example:
 |
|
 |
|
Trimethyl phosphonoacetate
Aldrich:
118°C
ACD/BP:
253.5°C [from DB]
|
|
Trimethyl phosphonoacetate
Chapman
& Hall DB: 87-90°C/0.2 torr
ACD/BP: 65.7°C/0.2
torr [from DB]
|
By analogy, a compound closely related to trimethyl phosphonoacetate--trimethyl 2-phosphonoacrylate-suffers from a similar problem. This compound had an error of 165ºC at 1 atm pressure!
 |
|
trimethyl 2-phosphonoacrylate
Aldrich:
91°C/760 torr
ACD/BP: 258.9oC
|
Hall of Shame
The
following compounds show differences of 200°C or greater
between the catalog-tabulated values and the ACD/Boiling Point
values. Below are listed the values from the Chapman and
Hall Chemical Database, which give independent confirmation of the ACD/Labs values at low-pressure measurements:
 |
 |
|
2,2,2-Trichloroethyl
phosphorodichloridate
Aldrich:
56-58°C
ACD/BP:
269.4°C
|
2,2,2-Trichloroethyl
phosphorodichloridate
Chapman
& Hall DB: 116-118°C/14 torr
ACD/BP: 137.4°C/14
torr
|
 |
 |
|
2,2,2-Tribromoethyl
phosphorodichloridate
Aldrich:
91°C
ACD/BP:
298.1°C
|
2,2,2-Tribromoethyl
phosphorodichloridate
Chapman
& Hall DB: 90-92°C/0.4 torr
ACD/BP: 89.3°C/0.4
torr
|
 |
 |
|
Diethyl
cyanomethylphosphonate
Aldrich:
102°C
ACD/BP: 305.2oC
[from DB]
|
Diethyl
cyanomethylphosphonate
Chapman
& Hall DB: 88-94°C/0.02 torr
ACD/BP: 58oC/0.02
torr [from DB]
|
 |
 |
|
Triethyl
2-fluoro-2-phosphonoacetate
Aldrich:
75°C
ACD/BP:
339.5°C [from DB]
|
Triethyl
2-fluoro-2-phosphonoacetate
Chapman
& Hall DB: 125°C/0.7 torr
ACD/BP: 133.2°C/0.7
torr [from DB]
|
 |
 |
|
Triethyl
phosphonoformate
Aldrich:
118°C
ACD/DB:
267.8°C [from DB]
|
Triethyl
phosphonoformate
Chapman
& Hall DB: 103-105°C/0.08 torr
ACD/BP: 101.0°C/0.08
torr [from DB]
|
Conclusion
We
think these examples are enough to deliver a simple message: the
tabulated values have some inconsistencies. We realize
that the chemical supplier is not in the business of measuring
boiling points, and we don't really want to criticize,
because in many cases their listed boiling points are fine. But if
you need an estimate you can depend on, we stand behind
ACD/Boiling Point.
Our
predictive software, ACD/Boiling Point,
is more likely to give you a realistic value for the temperature
at which you can expect your compound to boil. A survey of some 6,000 experimental boiling points, summarized in the accompanying
figure, shows that our predictions normally lie within 5°C of
the true value.
We also calculate the uncertainty
for the prediction. Our software will show, as a graph or a table,
the boiling point dependence over the range of pressures from
0.001 to 7,600 torr. And all this is run from a simple intuitive
sketching interface.
ACD/Boiling Point
is an empirical additive-constitutive method, which interpolates
or extrapolates, based on the compound structure, from several
thousand known values. The algorithm was developed from solid
approximations made by our world-class team of physical chemists.
When it comes to boiling points, we are second to none.
|